Evaluasi Teknis Pembangunan Ruang Kelas Dua Lantai pada Sekolah Dasar Berlahan Terbatas: Perspektif Perencana

Authors

  • Hendro Damanra Universitas Andalas
  • Bambang Istijono Universitas Andalas

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.58169/jwikal.v5i1.1101

Keywords:

Classroom Development, Constructability, Educational Building, Land Limitation, Planner Perspective

Abstract

Limited land availability is a major constraint in developing school infrastructure in active urban educational facilities. This study evaluates the classroom development plan at SDN 39 Lubuklinggau from the perspective of a planner, focusing on land limitation, functional needs, safety, constructability, and long-term building performance. A descriptive-evaluative approach was applied through technical observation, document review, alternative assessment, weighted scoring, and risk analysis. The results indicate that horizontal expansion is constrained by limited open space and may reduce internal circulation, student activity areas, and emergency space. Three alternatives were compared: horizontal expansion, building rearrangement, and a two-storey classroom scheme. The two-storey alternative obtained the highest score of 84, compared with 61 for rearrangement and 56 for horizontal expansion. However, its feasibility depends on further soil investigation, structural design, staircase and evacuation safety, utility coordination, construction phasing, and strict site safety control. The study recommends that the planner prioritize detailed site measurement, geotechnical investigation, detailed engineering design, construction safety planning, and post-construction functional evaluation. A vertical classroom strategy can be considered a rational solution for land-constrained schools when supported by accountable technical planning and integrated project control.

References

Abuhussain, M. A., & Baghdadi, A. (2024). Building maintainability and life-cycle performance in public facilities: A review of design-stage determinants. Journal of Building Engineering, 82, 108312.

Agarwal, S., Sharma, R., & Singh, A. (2024). Building performance assessment for educational facilities: Linking design, operation, and user experience. Buildings, 14(2), 1–18.

Badan Standardisasi Nasional. (2019a). SNI 1726:2019 Tata cara perencanaan ketahanan gempa untuk struktur bangunan gedung dan nongedung. Badan Standardisasi Nasional.

Badan Standardisasi Nasional. (2019b). SNI 2847:2019 Persyaratan beton struktural untuk bangunan gedung dan penjelasan. Badan Standardisasi Nasional.

Badan Standardisasi Nasional. (2020). SNI 1727:2020 Beban desain minimum dan kriteria terkait untuk bangunan gedung dan struktur lain. Badan Standardisasi Nasional.

Balasbaneh, A. T., Sher, W., & Yeoh, D. (2025). Life cycle cost and building performance considerations in educational building design. Sustainability, 17(1), 1–22.

Barrett, P., Davies, F., Zhang, Y., & Barrett, L. (2015). The impact of classroom design on pupils' learning: Final results of a holistic, multi-level analysis. Building and Environment, 89, 118–133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2015.02.013

Chadee, A. A., Owolabi, H. A., & Radhakrishnan, S. (2025). Integration management and decision quality in public construction projects. International Journal of Construction Management, 25(1), 1–13.

Cleveland, B., & Mahat, M. (2026). Learning environments and evidence-informed school facility planning. Educational Planning, 33(1), 25–42.

Darmawan, A., & Khoiroh, N. (2025). Physical learning environment, comfort, and student performance in elementary classrooms. Journal of Educational Facilities, 12(1), 44–58.

Dudek, M. (2000). Architecture of schools: The new learning environments. Architectural Press.

Harris, F., & McCaffer, R. (2013). Modern construction management (7th ed.). Wiley-Blackwell.

Hashempour, N., Khan, A., & Farahani, L. M. (2025). School safety, open space, and evacuation planning in dense educational sites. Safety Science, 175, 106512.

Hinze, J., Hallowell, M., & Baud, K. (2013). Construction-safety best practices and relationships to safety performance. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 139(10), 04013006. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000751

Kementerian Pendidikan Nasional. (2007). Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan Nasional Nomor 24 Tahun 2007 tentang Standar Sarana dan Prasarana Sekolah/Madrasah Pendidikan Umum. Kementerian Pendidikan Nasional.

Kirkham, R. (2007). Ferry and Brandon's cost planning of buildings (8th ed.). Blackwell Publishing.

Maryam, S., Rahman, A., & Putra, D. (2025). Classroom environmental quality and learning performance in primary school buildings. Journal of Educational Infrastructure, 9(2), 77–91.

Project Management Institute. (2021). A guide to the project management body of knowledge (PMBOK® guide) (7th ed.). Project Management Institute.

Ren, Y., Liu, J., & Chen, H. (2024). Land-use efficiency and compact development strategies for public facilities. Sustainable Cities and Society, 101, 105108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2023.105108

Republik Indonesia. (2002). Undang-Undang Nomor 28 Tahun 2002 tentang Bangunan Gedung. Sekretariat Negara.

Seuntjens, P., De Bleeckere, S., & De Meyer, R. (2024). Site-responsive planning for educational facilities in dense urban environments. Facilities, 42(5/6), 385–402.

Shah, A., Kumar, R., & Patel, M. (2025). Geotechnical considerations for vertical expansion of existing public buildings. Geotechnical and Geological Engineering, 43(1), 101–116.

Stamatiadis, N. (2005). Context-sensitive design: Issues and opportunities in transportation and public facility planning. Journal of Urban Planning and Development, 131(1), 28–35.

Vestfal, M., & Seduikyte, L. (2024). Indoor environmental quality in school buildings: Effects on comfort and learning. Energy and Buildings, 302, 113754.

Wang, T., Li, Z., & Chen, X. (2024). Wayfinding, circulation, and evacuation design in educational buildings. Journal of Building Engineering, 91, 109497.

Wardhani, S., Prasetyo, B., & Nugroho, A. (2021). Evaluasi kinerja bangunan pendidikan berdasarkan aspek fungsi, keselamatan, dan kenyamanan. Jurnal Teknik Sipil dan Lingkungan, 6(2), 101–112.

Wong, F. W. H., Lam, P. T. I., Chan, E. H. W., & Shen, L. Y. (2007). A study of measures to improve constructability. International Journal of Project Management, 25(6), 586–596.

Yilmaz, M., Demir, S., & Koc, K. (2025). Project integration practices for risk-based construction decision-making. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 32(2), 601–621.

Zhang, Y., Barrett, P., & Davies, F. (2024). School building design, student well-being, and learning outcomes: Recent evidence and planning implications. Building Research & Information, 52(4), 469–486. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.2022.1195

Zhou, J., Wang, Y., & Li, Q. (2020). Stair safety and ergonomic design in primary school buildings. Safety Science, 128, 104745.

Downloads

Published

2026-06-30

How to Cite

Hendro Damanra, & Bambang Istijono. (2026). Evaluasi Teknis Pembangunan Ruang Kelas Dua Lantai pada Sekolah Dasar Berlahan Terbatas: Perspektif Perencana. JURNAL WILAYAH, KOTA DAN LINGKUNGAN BERKELANJUTAN, 5(1), 326–336. https://doi.org/10.58169/jwikal.v5i1.1101

Similar Articles

<< < 1 2 3 4 5 6 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.