Evaluasi Kinerja Global dan Simpangan antar Lantai Struktur Gedung terhadap Gempa Ambon Menggunakan Analisis Pushover
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.58169/jusit.v4i1.1180Keywords:
Interstory Drift Rasio, Pushover Analysis, Response Spectrum Analysis, Seismic Demand, Structural PerformanceAbstract
Indonesia is located in a region with high seismic activity, making structural performance evaluation necessary to consider the seismic demand corresponding to the building location. This study evaluates the performance of the five-story SOHO Ginza PIK 2 Building, originally planned for Tangerang, when analyzed under the higher seismic demand of Ambon City. The model was developed using ETABS with existing dimensions, gravity loads, and spectrum parameters in accordance with SNI 1726:2019. Response spectrum analysis was performed on the existing model and two column modification schemes, namely column widening on Floors 2–3 and column widening by 100 mm. The model with widened columns that provided the best response was then compared with the existing model through pushover analysis. The performance point was obtained using the FEMA 440 Equivalent Linearization procedure, while the global performance level was interpreted using the ATC-40 drift limits. Under the Ambon spectrum, the maximum displacement of the existing structure in the X direction reached 86.99 mm and exceeded the limit, while the Y direction remained within the limit. Widening all columns reduced the displacement to 62.15 mm in the X direction and 53.26 mm in the Y direction. The global drift ratio at the performance point was approximately 0.014–0.018, within the Damage Control range. However, the interstory drift ratio on Floors 2–4 still exceeded the Life Safety limit. These results indicate that improvements in global stiffness and capacity do not always produce uniform improvements in local performance; therefore, global and local indicators should be considered simultaneously.
References
Aji Mustofa, R., Riakara Husni, H., & Isneini, M. (2024). Evaluasi kinerja struktur gedung bertingkat dengan metode analisis pushover (Studi kasus: Gedung 6 Rumah Sakit Pendidikan Perguruan Tinggi Negeri [RSPTN] Universitas Lampung). Jurnal Rekayasa Sipil dan Desain, 12(1). https://doi.org/10.23960/jrsdd.v12i1.4316
Applied Technology Council. (1996). Seismic evaluation and retrofit of concrete buildings (ATC-40).
Applied Technology Council. (2005). Improvement of nonlinear static seismic analysis procedures (FEMA 440).
Avulapalle, N., Chenna, R., & Vemuri, J. (2023). Assessment of seismic retrofitting interventions in reinforced concrete structures. Geohazard Mechanics, 1(2), 194–202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ghm.2023.04.003
BMKG. (2019). Ulasan guncangan tanah akibat gempabumi di Ambon Maluku. https://www.bmkg.go.id/gempabumi/ulasan-guncangan-tanah/ulasan-guncangan-tanah-akibat-gempabumi-di-ambon-maluku-26-september-2019
BSN. (2019). SNI 1726-2019 tata cara perencanaan ketahanan gempa untuk struktur bangunan gedung dan non gedung.
Chong, X., Liu, H., Xie, L., Zhou, A., Huang, J., & Sha, H. (2024). Experimental investigation of retrofitting seismically damaged reinforced-concrete frames using steel jacketing. Structures, 62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.istruc.2024.106243
Elza, S. P., Citra, Z., Edra Swasti, T., & Komerdevi, D. (2025). Analisis perbandingan simpangan akibat gempa pada bangunan 7 lantai di berbagai kategori situs tanah di Indonesia. Jurnal Media Konstruksi, 10(2). https://doi.org/10.33772/jmk.v10i2.156
Erizal, E., Arrafi, N. R., & Mentari, S. (2024). Evaluation of seismic performance of Sabilulungan 99 Tower structure in Bandung Regency with nonlinear pushover static analysis method. Media Komunikasi Teknik Sipil, 30(2), 166–176. https://doi.org/10.14710/mkts.v30i2.65172
Firdha, R. A., Mohd Isneini, H., Riakara Husni, H., & Widyawati, R. (2021). Analisis kinerja struktur gedung bertingkat terhadap beban gempa dengan metode pushover analysis (Studi kasus: Gedung Rawat Inap Non-Bedah Rumah Sakit Umum Daerah). Jurnal Rekayasa Sipil dan Desain, 9(4), 829–840. https://doi.org/10.23960/jrsdd.v9i4.2201
Gaetani d’Aragona, M., Polese, M., & Prota, A. (2022). Stick model for as-built and retrofitted infilled RC frames. Engineering Structures, 268. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2022.114735
Guci, J. M., Zulhendra, R., Putri Yastari, F., & Putri Elza, S. (2025). Studi komparatif efisiensi struktur Mall 7 lantai pada tanah SE dan SD terhadap beban gempa di Sumatera Barat. Jurnal Media Konstruksi, 10(2). https://doi.org/10.33772/jmk.v10i2.137
Hadzima-Nyarko, M., Işık, E., Radu, D., Bulajić, B., Lozančić, S., Radić, J., & Ereš, A. (2025). Effectiveness of high-performance concrete jacketing in improving the performance of RC structures. Applied Sciences, 15(21). https://doi.org/10.3390/app152111421
Liu, S. W., Liu, Y. P., & Chan, S. L. (2010). Pushover analysis by one element per member for performance-based seismic design. International Journal of Structural Stability and Dynamics, 10(1), 111–126. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0219455410003385
Monfaredi, S., Hamidi, H., & Khosravi, H. (2022). Characterization of site location versus the causative fault in seismic demands of structures. Structures, 40, 693–710. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.istruc.2022.04.062
Mubarak, M., Abdullah, A., Azmeri, A., & Hayati, Y. (2019). Cost estimation of structural components of a building by considering the seismic load on different regions. Advances in Civil Engineering, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/7357913
Nugroho, W. O., Sagara, A., & Imran, I. (2022). The evolution of Indonesian seismic and concrete building codes: From the past to the present. Structures, 41, 1092–1108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.istruc.2022.05.032
Wulandari, W., & Wardi, S. (2023). Seismic performance of an RC building using pushover analysis (Case study: Three-storey flat house building in Padang City). JCEBT, 7(1). http://ojs.uma.ac.id/index.php/jcebt
Zhu, Z.-C., Luo, Y.-F., & Xiang, Y. (2018). Global stability analysis of spatial structures based on Eigen-stiffness and structural Eigen-curve. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 141, 226–240. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2017.11.003
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Jurnal Sipil Terapan

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.







