Analisis Evaluasi Kewajaran Harga terhadap Kualitas Pekerjaan Pembangunan Jembatan Log Cs

Authors

  • Antonius Suranta Peranginangin Universitas Cenderawasih
  • Dewi Ana Rusim Universitas Cenderawasih
  • Mujiati Surianata Universitas Cenderawasih

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.58169/jusit.v2i1.373

Keywords:

Price Reasonableness, Time, Quality, Quality of Work, SPSS

Abstract

Tender offer below 80% HPS can cause concerns during the implementation of the work, including the quality of work that does not meet the standards in the contract, delays to contract termination. The purpose of this study is to analyze the evaluation of price reasonableness, time performance, quality performance and describe the quality of work. The research variable is Quality of Work (X). The research method used is Quantitative Descriptive Analysis using SPSS version 26. Data collection methods using interviews and questionnaires. The analysis used is Price Fairness Evaluation Analysis, Time Performance Analysis, Quality Performance Analysis, and Quantitative Descriptive Analysis. The results of the fairness evaluation analysis show that the total bid without VAT is more than the total clarification price so that the bid is declared reasonable. Time Performance Analysis shows the acceleration of the project against the plan, Quality Performance is more than the quality of the plan. Descriptive Analysis of the quality of the Log Cs Bridge Construction work is Good. The price quote of PT Tantu Konstruksi Engineering is declared reasonable. Time Performance is Good, Quality Performance is Good. The quality of work on the construction of the Log Cs Bridge is good.

References

Ali Rahmat, dkk., (2022), Faktor-Faktor Yang Mempengaruhi Mutu Pelaksanaan Proyek Peningkatan Jalan Tedubara-Pising Kabupaten Bombana, Volume 3 Issue 1

Bayu Dwi Wismanto, (2022), Manajemen Konstruksi Profesional, Yogyakarta: CV. Budi Utama.

Dewi Kiki Patricia, Susetyo Budi, (2022), Analisis Kinerja Biaya Pada kontraktor Dengan Nilai Kontrak di Bawah 80% HPS pada Proyek Pengaman Pantai, Padang: Universitas Andalas (Unand), Vol.18, No.3

Jayanti Nur Dwi, (2016), Kualitas Pelayananan (Reliability, Responsivness, Assurance, Emphaty, Tangibles) di Legend Premium Coffee Yogyakarta, Yogyakarta: Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta, Hal 9 – 20.

Noor Juliansyah, (2017), Metodologi Penelitian, Jakarta: PT, Fajar Interpratama Mandiri.

Nusraningrum Dewi dan Priyono Joko, (2018), Analisis Pengendalian Biaya, Waktu, Dan Kualitas Pada Proyek Konstruksi, Vol. 17, No. 1

Purnomo Hendrita Abraham Angga dan H.S Mas Suryanto, (2016), Analisa Faktor-Faktor Yang Mempengaruhi Kinerja Waktu Pelaksanaan Proyek Konstruksi di Wilayah Surabaya, Vol.03 Nomor 03

Rusim Dewi Ana, dkk, (2019), Analisis Risiko Waktu dalam Pembangunan Gedung Ditinjau dari Sisi Kontraktor di Jayapura, Jayapura: Universitas Cenderawasih (Uncen).

Subrata Asep, dkk, (2020), Pengaruh Implementasi Kebijakan Nilai Penawaran di Bawah 80% Terhadap Kualitas Pekerjaan Konstruksi di Kabupaten Bandung, Bandung: Universitas Padjadjaran, Vol.3, No.3.

Published

2024-05-08

How to Cite

Antonius Suranta Peranginangin, Dewi Ana Rusim, & Mujiati Surianata. (2024). Analisis Evaluasi Kewajaran Harga terhadap Kualitas Pekerjaan Pembangunan Jembatan Log Cs. Jurnal Sipil Terapan, 2(1), 01–11. https://doi.org/10.58169/jusit.v2i1.373